<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress and the Google Link Attribute</title>
	<atom:link href="http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/</link>
	<description>Web design, search engine optimization and Internet marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:35:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DianeV</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>DianeV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/#comment-191</guid>
		<description>That *is* mighty interesting. It&#039;s either a huge goof, or ...

As an aside, I don&#039;t think one has to be a conspiracy theorist for things to be true. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That *is* mighty interesting. It's either a huge goof, or &#8230;</p>
<p>As an aside, I don't think one has to be a conspiracy theorist for things to be true. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/#comment-190</guid>
		<description>Blogger have updated their comment system so that people without Blogger accounts can leave comments - previously, to do this on a Blogger blog you had to comment anonymously, now it is possible to leave a name and uri.

This overhaul of their comment system was long awaited - but also, possibly, opens Blogger blogs to the scourge of comment spam.

Curiously though, Blogger failed to rollout an implementation of the nofollow attribute which Google themselves proposed recently to help combat comment spam. 

If I was a conspiracy theorist...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogger have updated their comment system so that people without Blogger accounts can leave comments &#8211; previously, to do this on a Blogger blog you had to comment anonymously, now it is possible to leave a name and uri.</p>
<p>This overhaul of their comment system was long awaited &#8211; but also, possibly, opens Blogger blogs to the scourge of comment spam.</p>
<p>Curiously though, Blogger failed to rollout an implementation of the nofollow attribute which Google themselves proposed recently to help combat comment spam. </p>
<p>If I was a conspiracy theorist&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DianeV</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>DianeV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 05:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/#comment-149</guid>
		<description>Discussion of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cre8asiteforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=112039#112039&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Blogs, WordPress and the nofollow attribute&lt;/a&gt; at Cre8asite forums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Discussion of <a href="http://www.cre8asiteforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=112039#112039" target="_blank">Blogs, WordPress and the nofollow attribute</a> at Cre8asite forums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DianeV</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>DianeV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/#comment-147</guid>
		<description>Dave Taylor blogs about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intuitive.com/blog/mt-tb.cgi/918&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;nofollow attribute&lt;/a&gt;.

Okay. Maybe it&#039;ll work: maybe it&#039;ll stop comment spammers dead in their tracks. Maybe they&#039;ll take their spambot software and go home.

Or maybe it&#039;ll be as effective as installing anti-spam software on your computer: it doesn&#039;t stop the spam attempts; it just changes your method of dealing with it.

Question: if comment and trackback spam did not exist, would these folks still recommend using the nofollow attribute?

It&#039;s a curious question, but one with a purpose:  while the majority of bloggers may not be particularly interested in promoting their blogs (fair enough), I wonder how many are familiar with Google&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/17/google-domain-aging-versus-the-sandbox/&quot;&gt;new domain ranking delay&lt;/a&gt; or the oft-debated &quot;sandbox&quot; effect whereby it appears that new websites are not given credit for their links for months on end (6-8 months and counting, for some). The point: links are one of the major factors in getting websites well-ranked and, it appears, one of the only methods most bloggers know about.

S-o-o-o ... if bloggers employ the nofollow attribute, then blogs will have less ability to rank well in search engines. Very especially new blogs. The heavy-duty linking blog networks of today have less ability to make each other visible in search engines. And maybe that is the point.

We are in a new era of Search Engine Wars. Heck, they&#039;re trying to out-do each other at every turn.  Have you ever seen uber-competitors Google, Yahoo and MSN.com agree to anything quite so breathlessly quickly?

For all I know, bloggers who do want to promote their sites will spend less time commenting on other blogs, and will use that time more productively and profitably by doing what the rest of us have done for years:  promoting the usual way.  Or --- gasp! --- paying for rankings.  When you can&#039;t get the job done, (Google) Adwords and (Yahoo&#039;s) Overture and paid advertisements are your friend.

No, I&#039;m not a spammer, and have zero good words for them. As some of them know.

I&#039;m just a marketer and a consummate curious person.  I tend to look at actions and trends. Follow the logic. Follow the money trail, and all that.

(P.S. Please don&#039;t mention meta tags; they haven&#039;t carried much weight in any major search engine in years.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Taylor blogs about the <a href="http://www.intuitive.com/blog/mt-tb.cgi/918" target="_blank">nofollow attribute</a>.</p>
<p>Okay. Maybe it'll work: maybe it'll stop comment spammers dead in their tracks. Maybe they'll take their spambot software and go home.</p>
<p>Or maybe it'll be as effective as installing anti-spam software on your computer: it doesn't stop the spam attempts; it just changes your method of dealing with it.</p>
<p>Question: if comment and trackback spam did not exist, would these folks still recommend using the nofollow attribute?</p>
<p>It's a curious question, but one with a purpose:  while the majority of bloggers may not be particularly interested in promoting their blogs (fair enough), I wonder how many are familiar with Google's <a href="http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/17/google-domain-aging-versus-the-sandbox/">new domain ranking delay</a> or the oft-debated "sandbox" effect whereby it appears that new websites are not given credit for their links for months on end (6-8 months and counting, for some). The point: links are one of the major factors in getting websites well-ranked and, it appears, one of the only methods most bloggers know about.</p>
<p>S-o-o-o &#8230; if bloggers employ the nofollow attribute, then blogs will have less ability to rank well in search engines. Very especially new blogs. The heavy-duty linking blog networks of today have less ability to make each other visible in search engines. And maybe that is the point.</p>
<p>We are in a new era of Search Engine Wars. Heck, they're trying to out-do each other at every turn.  Have you ever seen uber-competitors Google, Yahoo and MSN.com agree to anything quite so breathlessly quickly?</p>
<p>For all I know, bloggers who do want to promote their sites will spend less time commenting on other blogs, and will use that time more productively and profitably by doing what the rest of us have done for years:  promoting the usual way.  Or &#8212; gasp! &#8212; paying for rankings.  When you can't get the job done, (Google) Adwords and (Yahoo's) Overture and paid advertisements are your friend.</p>
<p>No, I'm not a spammer, and have zero good words for them. As some of them know.</p>
<p>I'm just a marketer and a consummate curious person.  I tend to look at actions and trends. Follow the logic. Follow the money trail, and all that.</p>
<p>(P.S. Please don't mention meta tags; they haven't carried much weight in any major search engine in years.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DianeV</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>DianeV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/#comment-146</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;From the Yow, Who Knew? Department&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bit of heated discussion in the WordPress forums&#039; &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/support/topic.php?id=21454&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;nofollow support added?&lt;/a&gt; thread. Apparently my choice of words wasn&#039;t appreciated. Or at least not by some.  Or at least not by one.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But the real interesting point is that it appears that WPforums now has a troll posting as &quot;Anonymous&quot;. Personally, I&#039;m torn:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;- Is this an angry but well-meaning blogger who is fed up with comment spam but doesn&#039;t understand what effects the nofollow tag will have on the blogosphere?&lt;br /&gt;
- Is this a frustrated SEO who couldn&#039;t outrank blogs?&lt;br /&gt;
- Or &lt;grin&gt; is it &#8230; corporate personnel?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Wouldn&#039;t be the first time. Jury&#039;s still out.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>From the Yow, Who Knew? Department</b></p>
<p>Bit of heated discussion in the WordPress forums' <a href="http://wordpress.org/support/topic.php?id=21454" target="_blank">nofollow support added?</a> thread. Apparently my choice of words wasn't appreciated. Or at least not by some.  Or at least not by one.</p>
<p>But the real interesting point is that it appears that WPforums now has a troll posting as "Anonymous". Personally, I'm torn:</p>
<p>- Is this an angry but well-meaning blogger who is fed up with comment spam but doesn't understand what effects the nofollow tag will have on the blogosphere?<br />
- Is this a frustrated SEO who couldn't outrank blogs?<br />
- Or &lt;grin&gt; is it &#8230; corporate personnel?</p>
<p>Wouldn't be the first time. Jury's still out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A peek at WordPress 1.5 and nofollow</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>A peek at WordPress 1.5 and nofollow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/#comment-164</guid>
		<description>[...] WordPress  February 2, 2005 	  A peek at WordPress 1.5 and nofollow   	Following up on my &lt;a href=&quot;http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;WordPress and the Google Link Attribute&lt;/a&gt;, I found [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WordPress  February 2, 2005 	  A peek at WordPress 1.5 and nofollow   	Following up on my <a href="http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/" target="_blank">WordPress and the Google Link Attribute</a>, I found [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google on Nofollow</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Google on Nofollow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/#comment-284</guid>
		<description>[...] e response was telling, and Scottie&#039;s remarks pretty much follow my January 22 analysis of &lt;a href=&quot;http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;WordPress and the Google Link Attribute&lt;/a&gt;. 	They we [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] e response was telling, and Scottie's remarks pretty much follow my January 22 analysis of <a href="http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/" target="_blank">WordPress and the Google Link Attribute</a>. 	They we [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordPress Nofollow Remover Plugin</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>WordPress Nofollow Remover Plugin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/#comment-551</guid>
		<description>[...] lend their support to the developers&#039; efforts. My thoughts to the contrary (posted here in &lt;a href=&quot;http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;WordPress and the Google Link Attribute&lt;/a&gt; were much [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lend their support to the developers' efforts. My thoughts to the contrary (posted here in <a href="http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/22/wordpress-and-the-google-link-attribute/" target="_blank">WordPress and the Google Link Attribute</a> were much [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

