<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: User-Friendly Blog Design and You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://developedtraffic.com/2005/04/06/user-friendly-blog-design-and-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/04/06/user-friendly-blog-design-and-you/</link>
	<description>Web design, search engine optimization and Internet marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:52:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: teli</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/04/06/user-friendly-blog-design-and-you/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>teli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2005/04/06/user-friendly-blog-design-and-you/#comment-404</guid>
		<description>ah - I see. Actually, my anonymous blog does have an &quot;About&quot; page - it doesn&#039;t say who I am, but it gives a brief overview of &lt;em&gt;why&lt;/em&gt; the website is there...

I think most bloggers think that people will find them again through their website name and that most people reading will figure out who they are from the postings (i.e. the posted by: Yoda) - but I definitely get your point...I&#039;ve come across a few blogs where I&#039;d like to know who the author was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah &#8211; I see. Actually, my anonymous blog does have an "About" page &#8211; it doesn't say who I am, but it gives a brief overview of <em>why</em> the website is there&#8230;</p>
<p>I think most bloggers think that people will find them again through their website name and that most people reading will figure out who they are from the postings (i.e. the posted by: Yoda) &#8211; but I definitely get your point&#8230;I've come across a few blogs where I'd like to know who the author was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DianeV</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/04/06/user-friendly-blog-design-and-you/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>DianeV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2005/04/06/user-friendly-blog-design-and-you/#comment-395</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ian&lt;/strong&gt; -- and a witty colophon it is, too. Had me chuckling! Love that understated (or is it deadpan?) humor.

&lt;strong&gt;Teli&lt;/strong&gt; -- I&#039;m thinking that yours is a different situation (yes, I read your blog). The lack of an &quot;About&quot; page is (will be?) on purpose. I was thinking that a page that basically says &quot;I&#039;m not saying&quot; might be helpful but, on the other hand, you&#039;d have to make sure it didn&#039;t mirror too much what you said on your first blog.

In any case, I was speaking in general and from the viewpoint of website usability. I&#039;ve seen a few blogs that *apparently* were not intended to be anonymous. It may have been that the blog software didn&#039;t provide for separate pages outside of the article-posting scenario. Still, unless intentional, it&#039;s an oversight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ian</strong> &#8212; and a witty colophon it is, too. Had me chuckling! Love that understated (or is it deadpan?) humor.</p>
<p><strong>Teli</strong> &#8212; I'm thinking that yours is a different situation (yes, I read your blog). The lack of an "About" page is (will be?) on purpose. I was thinking that a page that basically says "I'm not saying" might be helpful but, on the other hand, you'd have to make sure it didn't mirror too much what you said on your first blog.</p>
<p>In any case, I was speaking in general and from the viewpoint of website usability. I've seen a few blogs that *apparently* were not intended to be anonymous. It may have been that the blog software didn't provide for separate pages outside of the article-posting scenario. Still, unless intentional, it's an oversight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teli</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/04/06/user-friendly-blog-design-and-you/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>teli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 06:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2005/04/06/user-friendly-blog-design-and-you/#comment-386</guid>
		<description>Well, in defense of some blog authors - it may be an anonymous blog. I know I personally have one...or are you just looking for any &#039;ole name, even a pseudonym?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, in defense of some blog authors &#8211; it may be an anonymous blog. I know I personally have one&#8230;or are you just looking for any 'ole name, even a pseudonym?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/04/06/user-friendly-blog-design-and-you/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 06:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2005/04/06/user-friendly-blog-design-and-you/#comment-385</guid>
		<description>While my DNS servers are rerouting and my site may not be available for 24 hours or so, writing a &#039;colophon&#039; page was one of the most enjoyable additions to my site in awhile. It always put it off thinking it was silly and because I didn&#039;t know what to include but now I&#039;m glad I added it because you build &#039;community&#039; that way...I&#039;ve enjoyed &lt;em&gt;your&lt;/em&gt; site for quite awhile now; thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While my DNS servers are rerouting and my site may not be available for 24 hours or so, writing a 'colophon' page was one of the most enjoyable additions to my site in awhile. It always put it off thinking it was silly and because I didn't know what to include but now I'm glad I added it because you build 'community' that way&#8230;I've enjoyed <em>your</em> site for quite awhile now; thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

