<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dreamweaver FTP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/02/dreamweaver-ftp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/02/dreamweaver-ftp/</link>
	<description>Web design, search engine optimization and Internet marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:52:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Diane Vigil</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/02/dreamweaver-ftp/#comment-134902</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Vigil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/02/dreamweaver-ftp/#comment-134902</guid>
		<description>Hi, John. I know what you mean. I was hand-coding before I started with Dreamweaver, and I still hand-code quite a bit in its code view.

Unfortunately, I don&#039;t have a recommendation for sync-ing local and remote copies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, John. I know what you mean. I was hand-coding before I started with Dreamweaver, and I still hand-code quite a bit in its code view.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, I don't have a recommendation for sync-ing local and remote copies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/02/dreamweaver-ftp/#comment-134900</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/02/dreamweaver-ftp/#comment-134900</guid>
		<description>Hi, Diane. I&#039;ve been using Dreamweaver since it&#039;s first release date and I&#039;m very happy with it, but now it&#039;s somewhat cumbersome for me, I&#039;m using simple text editor with highlighting, and using Dreamweaver for sync only getting very inconvenient.

Can you suggest some app for sync local copy â†’ remote FTP?

Thanks..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Diane. I've been using Dreamweaver since it's first release date and I'm very happy with it, but now it's somewhat cumbersome for me, I'm using simple text editor with highlighting, and using Dreamweaver for sync only getting very inconvenient.</p>
<p>Can you suggest some app for sync local copy â†’ remote FTP?</p>
<p>Thanks..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DianeV</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/02/dreamweaver-ftp/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>DianeV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 22:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/02/dreamweaver-ftp/#comment-771</guid>
		<description>Hm. I will need to check into that (the sync feature); sounds useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm. I will need to check into that (the sync feature); sounds useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/02/dreamweaver-ftp/#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 21:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/02/dreamweaver-ftp/#comment-770</guid>
		<description>Ah, sounds like they have worked out some of the bugs then, I do get frustrated with the versions i&#039;ve used seeming to take a long time to &#039;connect&#039; to the server before actually uploading.  once it&#039;s done that, it seems fine.

The sync facility is quite good too, being able to compare local and remote folders, and to even work directly on the remote files, if you really want to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, sounds like they have worked out some of the bugs then, I do get frustrated with the versions i've used seeming to take a long time to 'connect' to the server before actually uploading.  once it's done that, it seems fine.</p>
<p>The sync facility is quite good too, being able to compare local and remote folders, and to even work directly on the remote files, if you really want to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DianeV</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/02/dreamweaver-ftp/#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>DianeV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 17:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/02/dreamweaver-ftp/#comment-768</guid>
		<description>Hi Adrian (nice to see you!).

I hadn&#039;t ever tried it before, but I find, strangely enough, that the upload is *very* fast, perhaps even faster than WS_FTP 9.01 Professional. I&#039;ve been pleasantly surprised, and even grateful for Macromedia&#039;s taking the one extra step out of the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Adrian (nice to see you!).</p>
<p>I hadn't ever tried it before, but I find, strangely enough, that the upload is *very* fast, perhaps even faster than WS_FTP 9.01 Professional. I've been pleasantly surprised, and even grateful for Macromedia's taking the one extra step out of the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/02/dreamweaver-ftp/#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 16:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/02/dreamweaver-ftp/#comment-767</guid>
		<description>Cool feature eh Diane? :D
I&#039;ve been using it on MX and MX2004 for a while and it&#039;s generally pretty good.  I do get problems with it communicating with the server as quickly as I&#039;d like at times, even to the extent that I&#039;d have an FTP client open as well when its really bad.

Generally good though, perhaps they&#039;ve ironed out a few bugs in version 8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool feature eh Diane? :D<br />
I've been using it on MX and MX2004 for a while and it's generally pretty good.  I do get problems with it communicating with the server as quickly as I'd like at times, even to the extent that I'd have an FTP client open as well when its really bad.</p>
<p>Generally good though, perhaps they've ironed out a few bugs in version 8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

