<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When change comes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/03/when-change-comes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/03/when-change-comes/</link>
	<description>Web design, search engine optimization and Internet marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:35:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DianeV</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/03/when-change-comes/#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>DianeV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2005 09:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/03/when-change-comes/#comment-760</guid>
		<description>I know what you mean, Phil. I think many people are more than a little nervous about which programs might be dropped for others that do much the same thing.

I somewhat misspoke in my original post; I&#039;ve only been using Dreamweaver for a few years now, but find the improvements in DW8 to be well worth the upgrade; the best of which that Macromedia is incorporating what (I think is) &lt;a href=&quot;http://developedtraffic.com/2005/09/20/dreamweaver-8-mini-review/&quot;&gt;a more natural workflow&lt;/a&gt; into the tools.  I just started using Dreamweaver&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/02/dreamweaver-ftp/&quot;&gt;internal FTP&lt;/a&gt;, and find it a convenient timesaver.

That said, Adobe too has been improving its products in much the same way as Macromedia.  The new Adobe Bridge is a kind of desktop image viewer, but does so much more than that, and is integrated into the Photoshop workflow. I would never have thought of using that type of program, but have found it very convenient ... certainly more convenient than viewing images on my machine in any other application.

So, what do you think? Can we hope? &lt;grin&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what you mean, Phil. I think many people are more than a little nervous about which programs might be dropped for others that do much the same thing.</p>
<p>I somewhat misspoke in my original post; I've only been using Dreamweaver for a few years now, but find the improvements in DW8 to be well worth the upgrade; the best of which that Macromedia is incorporating what (I think is) <a href="http://developedtraffic.com/2005/09/20/dreamweaver-8-mini-review/">a more natural workflow</a> into the tools.  I just started using Dreamweaver's <a href="http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/02/dreamweaver-ftp/">internal FTP</a>, and find it a convenient timesaver.</p>
<p>That said, Adobe too has been improving its products in much the same way as Macromedia.  The new Adobe Bridge is a kind of desktop image viewer, but does so much more than that, and is integrated into the Photoshop workflow. I would never have thought of using that type of program, but have found it very convenient &#8230; certainly more convenient than viewing images on my machine in any other application.</p>
<p>So, what do you think? Can we hope? &lt;grin&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/03/when-change-comes/#comment-759</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2005 04:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2005/12/03/when-change-comes/#comment-759</guid>
		<description>Diane,

I can&#039;t agree more. I hope this &quot;Merger&quot; doesn&#039;t mean that Adobe will do away with Dreamweaver in favor of GoLive. I really don&#039;t like the later, that being said only time will tell. Let&#039;s hope for the best.

Regards,
Phil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diane,</p>
<p>I can't agree more. I hope this "Merger" doesn't mean that Adobe will do away with Dreamweaver in favor of GoLive. I really don't like the later, that being said only time will tell. Let's hope for the best.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

