<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>developedtraffic.com &#187; SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://developedtraffic.com/category/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://developedtraffic.com</link>
	<description>Web design, search engine optimization and Internet marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:12:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Rhea Drysdale wins Trademark lawsuit for the term SEO against Gambert</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2010/03/16/rhea-drysdale-wins-trademark-lawsuit-for-the-term-seo-against-gambert/</link>
		<comments>http://developedtraffic.com/2010/03/16/rhea-drysdale-wins-trademark-lawsuit-for-the-term-seo-against-gambert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Vigil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/?p=464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The news is flying around of Rhea Drydale's spectacular win in her opposition to Jason Gambert's attempt to register the term SEO as a trademark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. According to what Rhea posted at Outspoken media, &#8230; <a href="http://developedtraffic.com/2010/03/16/rhea-drysdale-wins-trademark-lawsuit-for-the-term-seo-against-gambert/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2005/02/07/seth-godin-on-the-seo-industry-again/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Seth Godin on the SEO Industry Again'>Seth Godin on the SEO Industry Again</a></li>
<li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2004/10/19/seo-versus-search-engine-friendly/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: SEO versus Search Engine Friendly'>SEO versus Search Engine Friendly</a></li>
<li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2004/08/23/what-is-holistic-web-design/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: What is holistic web design &#8230;?'>What is holistic web design &#8230;?</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://developedtraffic.com/2010/03/16/rhea-drysdale-wins-trademark-lawsuit-for-the-term-seo-against-gambert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google reads Flash &#8230; sort of</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2007/12/18/google-reads-flash-sort-of/</link>
		<comments>http://developedtraffic.com/2007/12/18/google-reads-flash-sort-of/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Vigil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2007/12/18/google-reads-flash-sort-of/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every now and then in forums, someone advises that Google reads Flash, as if that's the beginning and the end of the discussion. Having messed around with Flash a bit, I always think, "Yes, but how do you get H &#8230; <a href="http://developedtraffic.com/2007/12/18/google-reads-flash-sort-of/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2004/10/15/flash-intolerance-and-search-engine-news/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Flash Intolerance and Search Engine News'>Flash Intolerance and Search Engine News</a></li>
<li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2005/03/31/wordpressorg-and-the-google-adsense-debacle/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: WordPress.org and the Google Adsense Debacle'>WordPress.org and the Google Adsense Debacle</a></li>
<li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2006/02/11/google-traffic-power-ban/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Google Traffic-Power Ban'>Google Traffic-Power Ban</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://developedtraffic.com/2007/12/18/google-reads-flash-sort-of/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comment spam linking to archive.org</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2007/10/10/comment-spam-linking-to-archiveorg/</link>
		<comments>http://developedtraffic.com/2007/10/10/comment-spam-linking-to-archiveorg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Vigil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2007/10/10/comment-spam-linking-to-archiveorg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just saw a good one &#8212; comment spam linking to archive.org. The spam, caught by Akismet, was so different that it caught my eye, so I took a look at the links. Well, the pages at archive.org contained nothing &#8230; <a href="http://developedtraffic.com/2007/10/10/comment-spam-linking-to-archiveorg/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/20/new-google-anti-comment-spam-link-attribute/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: New Google Anti-Comment Spam Link Attribute'>New Google Anti-Comment Spam Link Attribute</a></li>
<li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2007/01/05/comment-spam-sponsored-links/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Comment Spam: "Sponsored Links"'>Comment Spam: "Sponsored Links"</a></li>
<li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2006/12/24/akismet-and-blog-spam/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Akismet and blog spam'>Akismet and blog spam</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://developedtraffic.com/2007/10/10/comment-spam-linking-to-archiveorg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Threadwatch is Closed</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2007/06/28/threadwatch-is-closed/</link>
		<comments>http://developedtraffic.com/2007/06/28/threadwatch-is-closed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 07:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Vigil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2007/06/28/threadwatch-is-closed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As promised by Aaron Wall, Threadwatch is closed. Despite the lengthy community comments, no word was publicly forthcoming about whether the site would be transferred, sold to someone else, or what. Feels a bit like a door being closed in &#8230; <a href="http://developedtraffic.com/2007/06/28/threadwatch-is-closed/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2005/11/30/nick-leaves-threadwatch/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Nick leaves Threadwatch'>Nick leaves Threadwatch</a></li>
<li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2007/10/10/comment-spam-linking-to-archiveorg/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Comment spam linking to archive.org'>Comment spam linking to archive.org</a></li>
<li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2005/06/24/yahoo-toolbar-and-macromedia-flash-cookies/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Yahoo Toolbar and Macromedia Flash Cookies'>Yahoo Toolbar and Macromedia Flash Cookies</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://developedtraffic.com/2007/06/28/threadwatch-is-closed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not posting at nofollow blogs</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2006/08/24/not-posting-at-nofollow-blogs/</link>
		<comments>http://developedtraffic.com/2006/08/24/not-posting-at-nofollow-blogs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Vigil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2006/08/24/not-posting-at-nofollow-blogs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For some time I've had a personal policy about avoiding posting at blogs that use the nofollow tag. As more people, friends among them, start blogs, I've just revisited my policy. I've come to the decision that my policy works &#8230; <a href="http://developedtraffic.com/2006/08/24/not-posting-at-nofollow-blogs/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2005/03/18/google-on-nofollow/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Google on Nofollow'>Google on Nofollow</a></li>
<li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2006/12/12/no-going-nofollow/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: No going nofollow'>No going nofollow</a></li>
<li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2005/08/05/wordpress-nofollow-remover-plugin/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: WordPress Nofollow Remover Plugin'>WordPress Nofollow Remover Plugin</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://developedtraffic.com/2006/08/24/not-posting-at-nofollow-blogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Claus delineates 302 Page Highjacking</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2006/03/02/claus-delineates-302-page-highjacking/</link>
		<comments>http://developedtraffic.com/2006/03/02/claus-delineates-302-page-highjacking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 22:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Vigil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2006/03/02/claus-delineates-302-page-highjacking/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Claus Schmidt has written an excellent article entitled Page Hijack: The 302 Exploit, Redirects and Google. The explanations there about what a 302 highjack is, and what can possibly be done about it, are far better than I could do &#8230; <a href="http://developedtraffic.com/2006/03/02/claus-delineates-302-page-highjacking/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2005/01/17/google-domain-aging-versus-the-sandbox/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Google Domain Aging versus the Sandbox'>Google Domain Aging versus the Sandbox</a></li>
<li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2004/11/10/pagerank-is-not-how-your-page-ranks/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: PageRank is not how your page ranks'>PageRank is not how your page ranks</a></li>
<li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2005/03/06/web-design-and-seo/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Web Design and SEO'>Web Design and SEO</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://developedtraffic.com/2006/03/02/claus-delineates-302-page-highjacking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Traffic-Power Ban</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2006/02/11/google-traffic-power-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://developedtraffic.com/2006/02/11/google-traffic-power-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Vigil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2006/02/11/google-traffic-power-ban/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those who have been following the Traffic Power lawsuits against Aaron Wall's SEObook.com and TrafficPowerSucks.com, one bit of vital evidence has emerged via Google engineer Matt Cutts on his blog: Confirming a penalty. Related posts:Google reads Flash &#8230; sort &#8230; <a href="http://developedtraffic.com/2006/02/11/google-traffic-power-ban/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2007/12/18/google-reads-flash-sort-of/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Google reads Flash &#8230; sort of'>Google reads Flash &#8230; sort of</a></li>
<li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2005/03/10/wsj-re-google-autolink/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: WSJ re Google Autolink'>WSJ re Google Autolink</a></li>
<li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2005/02/25/protest-increases-against-google-toolbar/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Protest increases against Google Toolbar'>Protest increases against Google Toolbar</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://developedtraffic.com/2006/02/11/google-traffic-power-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NetSol offering SEO</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2006/02/06/netsol-offering-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://developedtraffic.com/2006/02/06/netsol-offering-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 19:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Vigil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2006/02/06/netsol-offering-seo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though I don't use NetworkSolutions for domain names, I'm still listed as a contact for some clients, and received NetSol's email announcing their Do-It-For-Me Search Engine Optimization (SEO) service. Apparently they'll be offering: Optimization of your homepage and key content &#8230; <a href="http://developedtraffic.com/2006/02/06/netsol-offering-seo/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2004/10/05/rant-seo-versus-design/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Rant: SEO versus Design'>Rant: SEO versus Design</a></li>
<li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2004/10/19/seo-versus-search-engine-friendly/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: SEO versus Search Engine Friendly'>SEO versus Search Engine Friendly</a></li>
<li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2004/11/10/pagerank-is-not-how-your-page-ranks/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: PageRank is not how your page ranks'>PageRank is not how your page ranks</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://developedtraffic.com/2006/02/06/netsol-offering-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search engines ranking Flash?</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2006/01/13/search-engines-ranking-flash/</link>
		<comments>http://developedtraffic.com/2006/01/13/search-engines-ranking-flash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Vigil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2006/01/13/search-engines-ranking-flash/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The standard wisdom says that search engines don't rank Flash. Followed by recommendations for optimizing the page(s) containing the Flash movie. Turns out there are ex-Flash folk who are now SEOs. mapp (ex-moderator of the were-here.com forums) posts in SEW's &#8230; <a href="http://developedtraffic.com/2006/01/13/search-engines-ranking-flash/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2004/10/15/flash-intolerance-and-search-engine-news/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Flash Intolerance and Search Engine News'>Flash Intolerance and Search Engine News</a></li>
<li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2004/08/20/of-web-design-search-engines-internet-marketing/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: of Web Design &#038; Search Engines &#038; Internet Marketing'>of Web Design &#038; Search Engines &#038; Internet Marketing</a></li>
<li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2007/12/18/google-reads-flash-sort-of/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Google reads Flash &#8230; sort of'>Google reads Flash &#8230; sort of</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://developedtraffic.com/2006/01/13/search-engines-ranking-flash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Search of Stuff Blog</title>
		<link>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/09/08/in-search-of-stuff-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/09/08/in-search-of-stuff-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 02:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Vigil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developedtraffic.com/2005/09/08/in-search-of-stuff-blog/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wanted to point out Michael Motherwell's and Scottie Claiborne's new In Search of Stuff blog. In particular, Michael's post Linking Secrets Of The Ultra-Rich explains issues dear to the heart of SEOs. Tip: if you find you don't understand &#8230; <a href="http://developedtraffic.com/2005/09/08/in-search-of-stuff-blog/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2007/04/10/403/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why I Blog tag thing'>Why I Blog tag thing</a></li>
<li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2004/11/18/seo-and-sharing-dirty-little-secrets/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: SEO and Sharing Dirty Little Secrets'>SEO and Sharing Dirty Little Secrets</a></li>
<li><a href='http://developedtraffic.com/2006/01/13/search-engines-ranking-flash/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Search engines ranking Flash?'>Search engines ranking Flash?</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://developedtraffic.com/2005/09/08/in-search-of-stuff-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

